Everything you need to know about headless CMS development

Imarc has been building custom website solutions for 27 years. Over that time we've encountered challenging situations and have come up with tailored options based on unique factors.

One area we've seen expanded demand in recently is headless. However, headless CMS development isn't always the answer. Sometimes projects are better served with a hybrid approach or even a traditional one.

In this article, we'll go over what headless is, the best scenarios for headless CMS development, some examples of when headless design could be employed, and how a hybrid approach could help you reach your goals.

All about headless CMS development

A headless Content Management System (CMS) is an approach to content management and development that separates the back-end content storage and management from the front-end presentation layer. In traditional CMS architectures, the system is typically tightly integrated, meaning the way content is created, stored, and displayed is all happening within the back-end CMS.

A headless solution can provide more flexibility by allowing content to be delivered across various front-end channels (such as websites, mobile apps, or other devices) via APIs. This architecture allows developers to use their preferred tools and technologies to build the front end, enabling a more customized and optimized user experience.

There is also a mix of traditional and headless, which we will refer to as “hybrid”, where you can use APIs built into a traditional CMS to enable the same content distribution you find in a solely-headless approach.

The use of a headless or hybrid approach can offer several advantages, particularly in terms of flexibility, security, and future-proofing. By decoupling the content management from the presentation layer, organizations can easily update the design or technology of their digital platforms without needing to migrate or restructure their content. This is an attractive option for businesses looking to stay ahead in the rapidly evolving digital landscape, where adaptability and user engagement are key to success.

Words to know

When you're talking about headless, there are a lot of terms thrown around. Here are some of the most common ones that can help inform your conversation.

Static site generators–Next.js, Nuxt.js, and Gatsby are static site generators used to create the front-end presentation layer often coupled with a headless CMS. In the past, these kinds of generators had to rebuild the entire site when an update was made, but modern frameworks can now create builds incrementally, working faster and only rebuilding the elements that have changed.

Many generators are javascript or node-based and are built on frameworks like Vue, React, or Svelte. However, there are static generators written in just about any programming language, allowing for greater flexibility and the ability to match the code stack your team is most comfortable with.

Jamstack–Headless development ties into the jamstack which helps with speed, security, and scalability. The jamstack is statically built before it's put on a big server, which means that when API requests are made, they're asking for something that's already been built. The most common option before jamstack was LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP).

Why you may want a headless solution

So now that we've explained headless and some of the adjacent approaches, let's talk about why you might want a headless solution.

Security

Headless CMS systems can enhance security by separating the CMS from the presentation layer, potentially reducing the risk of web-based attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and denial of service (DDOS). Depending on the configuration, you can eliminate almost all traditional web attack vectors. Rigorous security protocols to be implemented on the CMS platform and API, ensuring secure enterprise-level data handling.

Performance

A headless approach can significantly boost website performance by allowing most of the front-end site to be static, which greatly reduces the load on servers during content retrieval, resulting in lightning-fast page loads. This approach not only enhances the overall user experience but also contributes to better search engine rankings.

Multi-channel

Headless CMSs are inherently designed for an omnichannel strategy (websites, mobile apps, digital signage, etc) allowing content to be easily published across various platforms from a single CMS. This flexibility ensures consistent content delivery and brand messaging across all channels, a key feature for those aiming to maintain a presence on multiple digital fronts.

Reliability

Headless architecture, with its separation of content management and delivery, ensures high reliability as the system can easily handle high traffic loads without impacting the content management interface. This robust structure is crucial for sites and applications where downtime can have significant business impacts.

Scalability

Scalability is a core advantage of a headless approach. In some cases, it can help accommodate growth or a refresh of your front-end presentation layer fairly easily. Enterprises can expand their digital footprint without overhauling their backend CMS infrastructure, making headless an ideal choice for businesses looking to grow and evolve in the digital space.

Taking a more hybrid approach

The fact is, headless may not be the ideal solution for your web project requirements. You can take a more traditional or hybrid approach, which can still offer many of the same security, performance, and multi-channel benefits of a headless build with slightly different configurations. Almost all traditional CMSs allow for headless decoupling via built-in API layers. Here are some reasons to choose this type of approach.

Reduced complexity

Traditional CMS platforms offer an all-in-one solution where content creation, management, and presentation are seamlessly integrated, potentially reducing the complexity for users and developers. This can simplify the process of website management, maintenance, and greatly simplify the amount of infrastructure needed to support your site or application.

More self-service

With a traditional CMS, users often have access to a wide range of built-in tools and templates, enabling them to create and manage content with minimal technical assistance. This self-service approach empowers users to make quick updates and changes without relying on developers, making it highly efficient for businesses with smaller technical and content teams.

Requirements such as site size or real-time integrations

Headless CMS systems might struggle with requirements such as real-time inventory lookups or handling the sheer content volume of very large websites. Challenges can arise due to the decoupled nature of the front-end and back-end. While some deployment services provide workarounds, a large site can potentially introduce a lengthy build/deployment process.

Vendor lock-in

With a headless CMS, especially those offered as SaaS products, there's a risk of vendor lock-in, as businesses may become overly reliant on specific platforms for delivering their content APIs and services. This can limit long-term flexibility and can lead to increased costs.

–

While not always the right solution, a headless approach to development can allow for increased performance, security, and flexibility depending on your website requirements. At Imarc, we offer all kinds of web solutions tailored to your specific needs, and we're always ready to take on your project. Let's talk!